Jumat, 13 Februari 2009

In the midst of the ordinary time (kronos), extraordinary time (kairos) happens.



Introduction
In a scene from Dead Poets Society, Professor John Keating challenges his boarding school English
class. They sheepishly stand in front of the trophy case peering inquisitively into the photographs of
alumna. The professor speaks with a deliberate tone about the boys in the faded black and white
photographs:
They're not that different from you, are they? Same haircuts. Full of hormones, just like you.
Invincible, just like you feel. The world is their oyster. They believe they're destined for great things,
just like many of you; their eyes are full of hope, just like you. Did they wait until it was too late to
make from their lives even one iota of what they were capable? Because, you see gentlemen, these
boys are now fertilizing daffodils. But if you listen real close, you can hear them whisper their legacy
to you. Go on, lean in. Listen, you hear it?
Carpe! Hear it?
Carpe! Carpe diem! Seize the day boys. Make your lives extraordinary.
Why does the call to live extraordinary lives ring so loudly for some they are compelled to follow it
with a zealous passion? What causes the same call for others to become merely a drone to ignore amidst
all the other noises of life? No matter where one falls on this continuum the call remains the same for
every human being. Carpe diem! [Literally, pluck the day] Choose to live in such a way that reflects the
extraordinariness of your life. Position yourself to get caught up in the great drama. You have been
destined to make an impact.
Lifetime
The span of time that measures a person’s life is referred to as a lifetime. Each person has a limited
span of time to live. Yet each person is given the opportunity to leave a legacy which is about

contribution, significance, and things that really matter. Could there be two spans of time, whether
recognized or not, which actually intersect?
Kronos (kronos) is the ancient Greek word which refers to sequential or linear time. In Greek
mythology, the god Chronos, pictured as elderly, gray-haired and bearded, was the personification of
time. Kronos is symbolized by the newborn baby that ushers in the New Year and ends the year as a
bent-over old man: Father Time. We know kronos time as chronology; tick-tock time. It is measured, or
chronicled, by clocks, hours, minutes and seconds. It is the time in which we make appointments and
face deadlines. It tends to be more of a nemesis or taskmaster than a friend. We schedule our lives by
it. Most people speak of never having enough of it as we race around the clock to make sure we
maximize the time. Some even refer to much of life as “putting in the time.”
Jonathan Larsen’s Broadway Musical Rent questions the measure of time, and parenthetically, the
quality of kronos time with the lyrics of “Seasons of Love”:
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Six Hundred Minutes
How Do You Measure - Measure A Year?
In Daylights - In Sunsets
In Midnights - In Cups Of Coffee
In Inches - In Miles
In Laughter - In Strife
In - Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Six Hundred Minutes
How Do You Measure a Year In The Life?
How About Love?
Larsen’s lyrics, while suggesting the continuum of life, carry angst for something more than tick-tock
time. In the journey of kronos time is there, could there be something more significant, something of
value, something legacy-driven that gives lasting impact to kronos time? The ancient Greeks would
answer in the affirmative.
Opportune Time
Kairos (kairos), even though the Greek meanings are complex and culturally dependent, refers to
the right time, opportune time or seasonable time. It cannot be measured. It is the perfect time, the
qualitative time, the perfect moment, the “now.” Kairos brings transcending value to kronos time. Eric
Charles White, in Kaironomia: On the Will-to-Invent, defines kairos with this imagery:
Archery – an opening, or opportunity or, more precisely, a long tunnel-like aperture through
which the archer's arrow has to pass. Successful passage of a kairos requires, therefore, that
the archer's arrow be fired not only accurately but with enough power for it to penetrate.
Weaving – the critical time when the weaver must draw the yarn through a gap that
momentarily opens in the warp of the cloth being woven.

Kairos is the right moment of opportunity which requires proactivity to achieve success. It is
significant and decisive. These moments transcend kronos, stirring emotions and realities to cause
decisive action. It is not an understatement to say that kairos moments alter destiny. To
miscalculate kronos is inconvenient. To miscalculate kairos is lamentable.
The Background of Kairos
Kairos was known in Greek mythology as the youngest child of the god Zeus.
Quite close to the entrance to the stadium [at Olympia] are two altars; one they call the altar of
Hermes of the Games, the other the altar of Kairos (Opportunity). Pausanias, Guide to Greece 5.14.9
His bronze statute was known as the most beautiful of statutes. Eye witnesses describe the statute
as youthful, “beautiful to look upon as he waved his downy beard and left his hair unconfined for the
south wind to toss wherever it would; and he had a blooming complexion, showing by its brilliancy
the bloom of his body…he stood poised on the tips of his toes on a sphere, and his feet were
winged.” The statue was so magnetic people “stood speechless at the sight.” The artist sought to
capture the very essence of kairos:
The wings on his feet, he told us, suggested his swiftness, and that, borne by the seasons, he
goes rolling on through all eternity; and as to his youthful beauty, that beauty is always
opportune and that Kairos (Opportunity) is the only artificer of beauty, whereas that of which the
beauty has withered has no part in the nature of Kairos (Opportunity); he also explained that the
lock of hair on his forehead indicated that while he is easy to catch as he approaches, yet, when
he has passed by, the moment of action has likewise expired, and that, if opportunity (kairos) is
neglected, it cannot be recovered." Callistratus, Descriptions 6
The Ancient Greeks, the seedbed of existential thinkers, sought to understand kairos at multiple
levels. They applied kairos thinking in arenas of legal, political, and epideitic (the artfully skilled and
heightened rhetorical expression of praise). In legal rhetoric, kairos was related to justice beyond the
written law, that is, law applied at specific times and circumstances unforeseen by legislators. Political
rhetoric concerns the elements of usefulness, suitability, and honor. Kairos was also central to the
Sophists, who saw kairos as the ability to understand the subtleties of a rhetorical situation. Kairos is
seen as the orator’s ability to adapt to and take advantage of the contingent circumstances.
One element of speech rhetoric is The Audience, the psychological and emotional makeup of the
hearers. The other is Decorum, the principle of apt speech. Aristotle identifies kairos as intrinsically
related to the time and space when proof must be delivered to the hearers. Therefore, speakers are to
be aware of their words AND be able to choose opportune moments to re-awaken the hearers. That
moment, recognized, chosen and acted upon, is kairotic or interchangeably, kairos. Kairos was not only
dependent upon the appropriate timing and purpose, but also the appropriate nature of the situation,
the approach, and the implications of what is being presented. [These concepts are explained in detail
4
in the book Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory and Praxis, Phillip Sipiora and James S.
Baumlin.] Modern day students of rhetoric are baffled by the word. S.H. Butcher who translated much
of Aristotle noted that “kairos is a Greek word ‘with no single precise equivalent in any other language.’”
(Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, 118). They believe that grasping the spirit of kairos IS their area of study
because the spirit of kairos is essential to the practice of rhetoric.
Even though kairos is a bit illusive, it is at the same time, alluring. The Greeks knew kairos
intersected kronos time. Yet, what was the impact of kairos? For whom was kairos available? Did
kairos opportunities reside for only a few? In Panathenaicus, Isocrates writes that educated people are
those “who manage well the circumstances which they encounter day by day, and who possess a
judgment which is accurate in meeting occasions as they arise and rarely misses the expedient course of
action.”
It was into this setting where another philosopher of a different bent, named Paul, engaged in
kairotic interchanges in Athens on the Areopagus (also known as Mars Hill). Can you picture a welleducated
man, known and respected for his zealousness in seeking to destroy the followers of a new
sect out of Jerusalem called “The Way” (also known as Christ-followers), and who had the ability to
stand toe-to-toe with philosophers, now directing his tenacity toward offering another, more divine
intersection of “opportunity?” Here’s one example:
[Paul] also had a debate with some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers. When he told them
about Jesus and his resurrection, they said, "This babbler has picked up some strange ideas." Others
said, "He's pushing some foreign religion." Then they took him to the Council of Philosophers. "Come
and tell us more about this new religion," they said. "You are saying some rather startling things,
and we want to know what it's all about." (It should be explained that all the Athenians as well as the
foreigners in Athens seemed to spend all their time discussing the latest ideas.) Bible, Acts 17:18-21
Paul, the Apostle, proceeded to write half of the books of the New Testament and redefined the concept
of kairos for his readers.
The Redefining of Kairos
The New Testament writers reflect the evolution of the word by referring to kairos time as the
present moment, the defining moment; a time-frame for divine interaction and occurrences. The Greek
and Roman gods and goddesses were capricious and dispensed good or ill arbitrarily. How would Paul
bring clarity to kairos?
As clearly as John Keating passionately urged, “Carpe diem,” Paul traveled throughout the Asia Minor
teaching, and more importantly, living out the message: exagorazesqai ton kairon literally, “buy up
the opportunity.” The word “buy up” has its roots in the image of going to the marketplace and seeking
to buy back, “to take it off the market”; to redeem. His admonition seems to be clear: people who live in
5
kronos time need to intersect with the Divine in order to grasp the full power of kairos. Go and buy back
opportunities! Redeem them for good!
It is difficult to measure kairos time. It flows; allowing us to be in the moment. Erwin McManus,
while never using the term kairos, speaks of a flow of time; movements which move in a timely manner
and waits for no one. Describing or capturing a kairos moment is fluid and beyond expression. McManus
suggests:
I think we need to spend a day with Monet. He had a clear sense of what was hidden in a
moment. Most of us think of a movement as something that’s stationary, stagnant, and
unchanging. We want to capture the moment and stand in the moment. If there’s a moment you
want to preserve or remember you must take a snapshot. The genius of Monet is that he saw
the moment for what it really was. It was as if he read the dictionary and realized that the
essence of the words moment and motion are the same. Monet was a master of light and
movement. His paintings were blurred and obscure and yet beautiful and full of insight. If we
could someone see life through his eyes, we would begin to see life as it really is. (An
Unstoppable Force)
Grasping the Depth of Kairos
One doesn’t catch up with kairos time rather one participates in it. Kairos time can occur during
activity or stillness. It simply intersects with kronos time. Newbery-Award winning author Madeleine
L'Engle, best known for her children's books, writes of kronos and kairos. She suggests that kairos can
sometimes enter, penetrate, and break through kronos: the child at play, the painter at an easel, the
saint at prayer, friends around the dinner table, the mother reaching out for the newborn are in what she
calls kairos.
Taking kairos a step further Jean Shinoda Bolen suggests, “When we participate in time and
therefore lose our sense of time passing we are in kairos; here we are totally absorbed in the present
moment, which may actually stretch out over hours.” (Close to the Bone: Life Threatening Illness and
the Search for Meaning, p 86)
T. S. Eliot (Four Quartets) ruminates in “The Dry Salvages” Number 3:
For most of us, there is only the unattended
Moment, the moment in and out of time,
The distraction fit, lost in a shaft of sunlight,
The wild thyme unseen, or the winter lightning
Or the waterfall, or music heard so deeply
6
That it is not heard at all, but you are the music
While the music lasts.
Could it be that one could get so caught up in kairos that kronos is truly transcended? At those
moments one is at soul-level.
The Kairos Call
The notion of kairos is characterized by what Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who survived years of
imprisonment and exile in the Gulag Archipelago, calls “knots,” those decisive historic moments in which
everything is rolled up and tied in a knot. In The Interpretation of History, Lutheran Theologian Paul
Tillich made prominent use of the term, referring to kairos as those moments of crisis in history which
create an opportunity for, and even demand, an existential decision. William Wilberforce forged the way
for the abolition of slavery in England. George Washington accepted many kairos opportunities as
general and president of a fledgling nation.
Abraham Lincoln, the once uneducated country-boy, delivered one of the shortest, yet memorable
addresses in American History on the Gettysburg Battlefield. As a determined leader of a war-torn
country he concluded with this kairos challenge:
It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that from these
honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of
devotion – that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain – that this nation,
under God, shall have a new birth of freedom – and that government of the people, by the people,
for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Winston Churchill, on June 18, 1940, gave a fiery-impassioned speech to the House of Commons that
historians believe turned the tide of the war by winning a victory for human freedom. Seemingly
defeated on every front, Churchill knew that he was the one to make the clarion call:
Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this Island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all
Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we
fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared
for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by
the lights of perverted science. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves
that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, "This
was their finest hour." (www.winstonchurchill.org)
The impeccable reality of kairos moments is that they are special, cosmic, and whether recognized
or not, even divine. “The hour is the God-given moment of destiny not to be shrunk from but seized with
decisiveness, the floodtide of opportunity and demand in which the unseen waters of the future surge
7
down to the present.” (Os Guinness, Character Counts) Nothing is more critical than to recognize and
respond to such a moment.
Kairos Possibilities and Potential
Throughout life, human beings are given multiple opportunities to seize high impact moments. These
kairos moments are rich with potential and pregnant with possibilities. “Whatever we may become,
wherever we go, whatever we do, we should always be aware of what once was, what might have been,
and what could well be again.” (Os Guinness, God in the Dark: The Assurance of Faith Beyond a
Shadow of Doubt)
Yet, with every opportunity comes a price tag. One cannot seize the day (or time) without choosing
to not seize something else, which will undoubtedly have consequences. The itinerate Rabbi Jesus would
speak frequently of counting the costs. People who choose to seize the moments are less concerned
about the sacrifices they are making than they are about the significance of their decision. The
encouragement is to make decisions wisely.
Think of the Old Testament story of Esther. Would she be open to seizing the day? Would she let
her divine moment pass her by? She was a lone Jew in a Gentile king’s harem at the precipice of
watching the potential genocide of her race when she was given this challenge by fellow-countryman
Mordecai: If you keep quiet at a time like this, deliverance for the Jews will arise from some other place,
but you and your relatives will die. What's more, who can say but that you have been elevated to the
palace for just such a time as this? (Esther 4:14) She stood face-to-face with her God-given moment of
destiny: a kairos moment. James Emery White confidently exclaims, “Kairos moments are never
pragmatic moves to ensure a blessed life during our short tenure on earth. They are moments to be
seized for the sake of eternity and the Lord of eternity.” (Life-Defining Moments: Daily Choices with the
Power to Transform Your Life, p 97)
In J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings (The Fellowship of the Ring), an elderly Bilbo Baggins
offers to carry The Ring of Power into the Dark Lord Sauron’s domain. His intention is to return it to the
Land of Mordor, into the fires of Mount Doom from which it was forged. Yet he knew the temptation of
the ring. So he said to himself, “Bilbo the silly hobbit started this affair, and Bilbo had better finish it, or
himself.” His old friend Gandalf the wizard releases him from the task, “If you had really started this
affair you might be expected to finish it. But you know well enough that starting is too great a claim for
any, and that only a small part is played in great deeds by any hero.”
The great starter of events, of course, is God Himself. And while the great deeds are not done by a
few, but by many, the heroes are bound by their choice to take a stand. Through this decision they
assume a role in the great contest between good and evil; between the movement of God and
rebellion of the Evil One. Each succeeding generation carries on playing its part in the great cosmic
battle that will eventually be brought to a finish at the end of history. The question is whether we
8
will choose to walk in the footsteps of the heroes who went before us. It’s a daunting choice indeed.
(James Emery White, Life-Defining Moments: Daily Choices with the Power to Transform Your Life, p
85)
Tolkien provides some clarity about kairos decisions throughout his epic. The hobbits, the elves,
Gandalf, the Fellowship are all part of a metanarrative; a story that provides framework upon which
other’s experiences can be built. Each of us is afforded moments to take a stand, regardless of
appearance (Frodo, the Hobbit) to position (Aragon, the king in waiting). Kairos moments can catapult a
person into the very essence of life, which often comes with great consequences. Yet, it is there, in
kairos moments, where we live the great drama of life. Maybe it is in those times when we feel most
alive, most in touch with our eternal purpose. Make no doubt about it, these moments are not just
discerned, they must be seized.
Bilbo’s young nephew, Frodo, knew when the kairos moment was calling him. That’s the way kairos
moments often present themselves. Challenges, calls, “leaps of faith” into the great unknown! Though
sometimes unexplainable, the call is unmistakable. Could there be a cosmic gong?
At last with an effort he spoke, and wondered to hear his own words, as if some other will was using
his small voice. “I will take the Ring,” Frodo said, “though I do not know the way.”
Elrond raised his eyes and looked at him, and Frodo felt his heart pierced by the sudden keenness of
the glance. “If I understand aright all that I have heard,” he said, “I think that this task is appointed
for you, Frodo; and that if you do not find a way, no one will. This is the hour of the Shire-folk, when
they arise from their quiet fields to shake the towers and counsels of the great. Who of all the Wise
could have foreseen it? Or, if they are wise, why should they expect to know it, until the hour has
struck? But it is a heavy burden. So heavy that none could lay it on another. I do not lay it on you.
But if you take it freely, I will say that your choice is right.”
Let’s be very clear, the kairos call is sometimes very challenging. The responsibility of the Ring came
upon Frodo unwanted, what seems to happen with kairos calls. Yet, the power lies in what we do with
the kairos moment. Reflect on some interchanges between Frodo and Gandalf:
Frodo: I wish the ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.
Gandalf: So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to
decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world
Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you were also meant
to have it. And that is an encouraging thought.
Frodo: I am not made for perilous quests. I wish I had never seen the Ring! Why did it come to
me? Why was I chosen?
Gandalf: Such questions cannot be answered. You may be sure that it was not for any merit that
others do not possess. (He was just a simple hobbit, after all.) But you have been chosen, and you
must therefore use such strength and heart, and wits as you have.
9
The weight of kairos opportunities can bring consternation. They call us out of our comfort zones. Oh to
have wise people, like Gandalf, who listen to our doubts and then remind us of the importance of seizing
kairos moments and staying the course! Kairos moments are well worth it.
The Challenge
Let’s tweak John Keating’s Latin urge to a kairos admonition: Tempus Occasio! Seize the kairos
moment!
Every human being is eternally valued. Every human being exists for only a certain amount of kronos
time. Thousands of years before The Byrds’ popular, “Turn! (To Everything There is a Season), King
Solomon wrote: There is a time for everything, a season for every activity under heaven. (Ecclesiastes)
The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, uses the word kairos to capture the writer’s
intent. The question is, “What will we do with our kronos moments?” There is something beyond kronos.
There is a time that impacts kronos with such intensity that it can alter the very kronos of a person’s life.
Every human being is wired with gifts and passions which afford opportunities to make unique impacts.
While each of us writes the script of our life, we have been given extraordinary potential to make a
difference. Tempus Occasio!
James W. Moore boldly writes, “Kairos time is full time, vital time, crucial time, decisive time…those
rich special moments that break into the humdrum and change your life; those powerful dramatic
moments when things seem to fall into place; a new perspective comes, and God seems to be speaking
loud and clear. That is kairos!” (Seizing the Moments: Making the Most of Life’s Opportunities, p 16)
Kairos and the Present Moment
The young struggling diabetic Shelby, in the movie Steel Magnolias (1989) muses, “I would rather
have thirty minutes of wonderful than a lifetime of nothing special.” Kairos moments are waiting to be
grasped.
There is no better time to apprehend kairos then the exact moment in time in which a person lives:
the present moment. Simply put, the past is over; the future has yet to be written. We have the gift of
the present moment in which to live. Will we seize the present moment or passively watch time tick by?
The question is far from cavalier. It carries with it the tenderness of a care-giver blended with the
challenge of a coach. The options are simple but the consequences can lead to great complexities.
Either we proactively seize kairos time or we, by choice, choose only to live in kronos time, which tempts
us to reshape the past or lures us to bring unwarranted assurances to our future. The later is a tenuous
place to live. It leads to limited satisfaction, feeds our control issues, and breeds a lack of contentment.
Can you think of a moment in your life which brought great joy to you? Fulfilling a dream, falling in
love, the birth of a child? If only that moment could be frozen in time. It cannot. That moment is in the
past, a memory to which we add other memories which will form the legacy of our lives. That moment is
10
to be remembered and celebrated. It becomes another stitch in the fabric of our lives. It dare not
become the entire garment. Recently three Detroit baseball players from an era long gone by were
featured guests at a local expo. These once stellar athletes, now plump old men, limped down the stairs
to their booth for signing autographs. There seemed to be two types of autograph seekers that day:
those who wanted a symbol of some of the good ‘ole years and those who were living as if the ’84 Tigers
just clinched the pennant. They donned jerseys and hats; taking the concept of “fan” to another level.
There was a difference from remembering the past and choosing to live in the past.
Conversely, can you think of a moment in your life which brought pain or sadness? Was it a poor
decision? Someone who hurt you? The loss of someone you love? If only that moment had not
happened. It did. That moment is also in the past, and added to our memory. It too, becomes another
stitch in the fabric of our lives. It dare not become the entire garment. How many people do you know
who live in the past with such intensity that it drives their very decision-making? Rather than choosing to
observe the past as a scar, they see it as a festering wound. Some even choose to regularly keep the
wound open. That way they can actually use the wound as leverage for manipulation or exacting some
revenge. Others peel back the scar when it is convenient giving them a good excuse for not taking
responsibility for their decisions.
The old saying is true, “He who ignores history is bound to repeat it.” However, there is a great
distance between knowing our past and choosing to live in the past. Philosophy majors spar over this
concept. Therapists earn a living helping people understand it. It is the crux of how human beings,
young and old, choose to live. Will we choose the present moment?
This is very practical. Take for instance, Brady Quinn, quarterback (2002-2006), The University of
Notre Dame:
Before coach Charlie Weis came to Notre Dame, Brady Quinn's development was like a slow, steady
drip. Quinn had arrived at Notre Dame as a highly touted quarterback … However, he wasn't able to
live up to the high expectations during his first two years in South Bend, IN.
With one season of eligibility remaining, Quinn holds almost every major Notre Dame single-season
and career passing record. His improved play has much to do with the Irish's return to a place among
the nation's elite programs. (Michael Rothstein, ESPN.com, January 2, 2006)
Charlie Weiss came to Notre Dame’s storied program as suburb playing-calling genius with three Super
Bowl rings. His pedigree is helping young quarterbacks succeed to monumental levels. In an interview,
Quinn was asked to describe the zenith of his turnaround, he simply reflected, “It all began when I
started to believe the coach.” What was the coach’s oft-repeated mantra to Quinn? Forget the past. I’ll
worry about your future. Your job is to live in the present moment.
What if a person would simply choose to live, just live, in the present moment? Imagine a life of
present moment living where authentic behavior is honed by the self-disciple, practice, and self-control of
the martial artist. Imagine what it would be like to make conscience efforts to let go of all our baggage –
11
childhood problems, prejudices, assumptions, interpretations, and projections – and being responsive to
the moment, appreciating “the power of now.” Present moment living is both spontaneous and
responsible. (Spiritually Intelligent Leadership, Danah Zohar, Leader to Leader, No. 38 Fall 2005)
Conclusion
In the span of every human being’s life there are kairos opportunities.
You may not be standing in the hallway of a boarding school with John Keating whispering,
“Carpe Diem!” But you are standing on the precipice of other kairos opportunities. Tempus
occasio!
You may not be a teenager who is seeking to understand the meaning of life. But you are
invited to find purpose and power as you gaze into the face of the One who created you and calls
you “Beloved,” offering you destiny-changing opportunities. Tempus occasio!
You may not be gazing into the pictures of those who lived a century ago. But you are invited to
study the lives of those who have taken their kairos moments and transformed their world.
Tempus occasio!
Are you ready for an adventure?
If you listen real close, you can hear opportunity calling. Your legacy is ready to be written.
Go on, lean in. Listen, you hear it?
Tempus! Hear it?
Tempus! Tempus occasio! Seize kairos!
Make your lives extraordinary.
Mark R. Freier
© Whatif Enterprises, LLC

Spiritualitas injili, transfomasi sosial dan kekaisaran global

Oleh : Andi Rahadian

The reality of the presence of the kingdom gives us the courage to begin here
and now to erect signs of the kingdom by working prayerfully and consistently for
greater justice and peace and toward the transformation of individuals and societies.
Since one day God will wipe away all tears, it grieves us to see people suffer now.
Since one day there will be perfect peace, we are called to be peacemakers now.
It is the call upon the churches, to stand in this ministry of practising love and seeking to restore the dignify of human beings created in the image of God.


Ketika kaum beragama dihadapkan masalah keadilan sosial apakah solusi yang dapat diberikan oleh mereka? Saat ini ketika kekristenan injili dihadapkan pada masalah kemiskinan dan ketidakadilan sosial , kaum injili masih menjawabnya dengan gagap dan menyikapi secara simplisistis. Spiritualitas cenderung dipahami secara parsial sebagai relasi vertikal manusia dengan Allah melalui kebaktian,doa,hymne,pujian dan kalaupun ada yang bersifat horizontal ,pada umumya saat ini ekspresi spiritualitas injili secara terbata-bata dicoba diejawantahkan dalam bentuk bentuk-bentuk aksi sosial karitatif pada kalangan yang terbatas.
Pada awal abad 21 dimana masalah ketidakadilan sosial global ,kemisikinan ,keterputusan akses setengah dari jumlah anak-anak usia sekolah dinegara dunia ketiga pada pendidikan dasar ,masalah ekologi dan sekelumit issue sosial lainnya yang mengancam keberlangsungan kehidupan umat manusia yang beradab ,maka sudah saatnya kaum injili mencoba mereformasi dan melakukan ekstensifikasi dalam pemahaman misi yang aktual saat ini,dan menjadikannya bagian dari pergumulan dalam perjalanan spiritualitasnya sebagai pengikut Yesus Kristus.
Ekstensifikasi issue keadilan sosial dalam spiritualitas injili
Masalah penderitaan manusia memang merupakan hal yang kompleks. Dari perspektif teologi injili penderitaan dipahami sebagai bagian yang tak terlelakan dari wawasan dunia kristen tetang kejatuhan manusia kedalam dosa.Diyakini oleh kaum injili tanpa ragu bahwa dampak kejatuhan Adam dan Hawa kedalam dosa ditaman Eden,telah menjadi batu roseta yang menjelasan asa-muasal penderitan manusia. Ketidakadilan sosial ,kemiskinan dan penderitaan adalah hasil ketidaktaatan manusa pertama yaitu Adam dan Hawa kepada hukum Allah (band : Kejadian 3 :1-10). Pilihan mereka (Adam dan Hawa) untuk melawan hukum Allah menandakan keinginan mereka untuk memberontak dan hidup otonom lepas dari hukum-hukum Allah. Sehingga secara ironis ,keinginan untuk “merdeka” tersebut telah memenjarakan mereka dibawah kutukan Allah dimana pada akhirnya semua manusia menjadi hamba dari dosa.Pemahaman inilah yang menjadi penjelasan ultimat kaum injili pada umumnya tentang asal mula ketidakadilan sosial yang dialami oleh umat manusia disepanjang sejarah. Sehingga segala macam penindasan oleh satu manusia pada manusia lain,pemerintah terhadap rakyatnya,penindasan suku bangsa kepada suku bangsa lain dipahami sebagai bagian yang tak terelakan dari dosa manusia.Jawaban terhadap masalah manusia yang berdosa adalah inisiatif dan kedaulatan Allah untuk menyelamatkan manusia melalui karya penebusan Putra Allah ,Yesus Kristus untuk menebus dosa manusia. Sehingga setiap manusia yang percaya tidak binasa melainkan memperoleh hidup yang kekal(Band.Yoh 3 :16) dan memperdamaikan manusia berdosa dengan Allah karena dosa-dosanya sudah diampuni didala penebusan Yesus Kristus.
Pemahaman inilah yang memotivasi banyak badan misi injili dan gereja-gereja injili untuk melakukan penginjilan kepada semua golongan orang dari berbagai latar belakang agama,suku bangsa.Karena injil dipahami sebagai satu-satunya carauntuk manusia diperdamaikan dengan Allah . Yang menjadi masalah adalah seringkali pemahaman penebusan dan dampaknya hanya dipahami dalam konteks transformasi pribadi saja. Penekanan pada pemuridan kristen injili menurut hemat penulis saat ini masih berkutat pada pietisme pribadi saja[1]. Padahal tanggung jawab pengikut Kristus yang telah diselamatkan dari dosa-dosanya dan yang relasi dengan Allah sudah dipulihkan,juga seharusnya berkaitan dengan kesalehan sosial.
Perlu diakui bahwa rekan-rekan dari kubu Kristen berhaluan Oikumenikal dan Katolik Roma telah melangkah lebih maju dalam pemahaman akan issue-issue ketidakadilan sosial dan kesalehan sosial. Memang tidak dapat ditampik ada perbedaan teologis yang tajam yang mendasari perbedaan penyikapan terhadap issue ini[2],tetapi kaum injili tidak perlu “alergi” dan mencurigai issue terhadap keadilan sosial sebagai sesuatu yang akan menghalangi fokus gereja terhadap pemberitaan injil. Alkitab menjelaskan bahwa wawasan dunia Kristen tentang penebusan juga tekait dengan transformasi sosial.Orang –orang percaya didalam Kristus yang telah mengalami pembenaran,penyucian dan pengadopsian oleh Allah untuk mejadi anak-anakya (didalam dunia ini),juga tetap memiliki tugas selain menunggu Parousia (Kedatangan Kristus yang kedua kali ) yaitu dengan “melakukan pekerjan baik “ yang ditetapkan oleh Allah sebelumnya.( Band Efesus 2 :1-10) .Penulis akan mencoba paparkan beberapa pernyataan Alkitab yang memanggil umat percaya untuk turut menjadikan tugas mewujudnyatakan keadailan sosial sebagai bagian yang integratif dari panggilan dan tanggungjawabnya sebagai pengikut Kristus.
Kerajaan Allah; cara hidup umat Allah untuk menegakan keadilan sosial ditengah dunia yang tidak adil.
Perjanjian Baru didalam kitab injil juga memberikan satu terminologi baru tentang gambaran hidup dan cara hidup orang pecaya kedalam satu terminologi yang diberi judul oleh Yesus sebagai “hal Kerajaan Allah”. Dimana didalam terminologi “Kerajaan Allah “ ini terkandung makna bahwa pengikut Kristus dipanggil oleh Yesus sendiri untuk hidup didalam cara dan pandangan yang baru sebagai orang yang sudah diperdamaikan dengan Allah yang diejawantahkan dalam sikap hidup yang mengutamakan relasi kasih dengan sesama manusia dan kemanusiaan seperti juga dengan relasi kasih kepada Allah. (Band. Matius 22:34-40[3]) .
Variabel ini saling mengikat dan mempengaruhi. Misalnya saja Yesus mengambarkan bahwa orang yang tidak mengampuni kesalahan saudaranya digambarkan sebagai orang yang belum memahami dan mengalami realitas pengampunan Allah secara eksistensial (Band .Matius 18:21-35). Yesus juga memberi parabel dan penjelasan yang menohok orang-orang Yahudi tentang siapakah sesama manusia yang perlu dikasihi dan mendapkan perhatian (Band .Lukas 10:25-37). Dari perspektif Yesus cara anggota kerajaan Allah mengasihi, sebagai orang yang sudah memiliki hidup yang kekal digambarkan dengan kisah orang Samaria yang melakukan aksi konkret untuk menolong orang Yahudi ( yang secara idelogis dan agama memliki pandangan yang bersebrangan dengan dia), yang dirampok dan terluka parah karena dipukuli habis-habisan. Orang Samaria ini dengan tanpa pamrih dan penuh resiko[4] menolong si korban bahkan membiayai seluruh pengobatannya ,tanpa ada tujuan proselitisme (pengkoversian agama),motivasi ekonomis atau apapun.
Yesus juga pernah memberikan parabel yang sangat mengejutkan bagi para pendengarnya,ketika Yesus menjelaskan bahwa Kerajaan Allah pada penghakiman yang terakhir kelak akan diberikan bagi mereka yang “memberikan makan ketika Aku lapar,memberikan minum ketika aku haus ,memberikan tumpangan ketika aku menjadi orang asing. (band. Matius 25 :34-40).Para pendengar Yesus bertanya:
”Maka orang-orang benar itu akan menjawab Dia,katanya:Tuhan bilamanakah kami melihat Engkau lapar, dan memberi Engkau makan, atau haus dan kami memberi Engkau minum ?Bilamanakah kami melihat Engkau melihat sebagai orang asing, dan kami memberi Engkau tumpangan, atau telanjang dan memberi Engkau pakaian? Bilamanakah kami melihat Engkau sakit atau dalam penjara dan mengunjungi Engkau? (Matius 25 :37-39)
Yesus menjawab dengan pernyataan ” Sesungguhnya segala sesuatu yang engkau lakukan untuk saudaraku yang paling hina ini kamu telah melakukannya untuk Aku”.(Matius 25 :40)
Tuhan Yesus mengidentikkan dirinya dengan orang-orang yang kelaparan,kehausan,telanjang,tertindas dipenjara ,mengalami ketidakadilan secara politis,ekonomi,dan lain-lain. Allah digambarkan sebagai bagian dari dunia ynag menderita.Sehingga ketika warga kerajaan Allah yaitu umat percaya mengambil bagian untuk peduli da bertindak untuk menolong orang-orang miskin,terdindas,kelaparan dan yang mengalami ketidakadilan sosial, dalam kesadaran dan pemahaman dari Matius 25:34-40 ini maka umat percaya sedang menghidupi realita kerajaan Alah didunia ini.
Realita dimana kerajaaan Allah memberi keberanian untuk memulai dimasa ini Untuk menegakkan kerajaan Alah yang “sedang” dan yang akan “datang” ini dalam doa dan karya yang konsisiten menuju transformasi individu dan masyarakat.Ini adalah panggilan agung bagi gereja yang kedua dan sama pentinnya selain memberitakan injil keselamatan didalam Kristus Yesus yaitu menegakkan kehormatan kemanusiaan sesuai dengan gambaran penciptanya .

Tanda zaman : Ketidakadilan sosial dan Kekaisaran Global.
Pengikut Kristus perlu memahami “tanda-tanda Zaman untuk dapat mengikuti perintah Kristus diwaktunya. Ditengah dunia kita yang belum mengenal injil , kita juga hidup dizaman ketidak adilan,kemiskinan dan kelaparan menyerang masyarakat dunia diberbagai negara tanpa kecuali Indonesia. Sensus ekonomi internasional dan Bank dunia pada Tahun 2006 [5]menemukan fakta-fakta yang menyedihkan seperti :
1 Miliar orang( 70 persennya didunia belahan selatan) didunia ini hidup dengan penghasilan kurang dari 1 dollar amerika/hari.(Di saat yang sama dibelah utara 50vuuta orang mendapat penghasilan 100 juta dolar /hari !)
824 juta orang didunia menderita kelaparan ( makan 4 kali dalam satu minggu!)pada tahun 2003.
77 Juta anak usia sekolah sekolah dasar tidak mendapat kesempatan untuk mengenyam pendidikan.
Secara global 1 dari 5 anak perempuan usia sekolah dasar dibenua Afrika dan timur tengah tidak mengenyam pendidikan dasar formal.
1,1 Milyar orang didunia saat ini tidak memperoleh akses kepada air bersih layak pakai dan minum.
500.000 orang ibu yang melahirkan meninggal tiap tahunnya karena minimnya akses kesehatan,obat-obatan dan peralatan yang tidak higienis yang dipakai selama proses persalinan.
Negara-negara dengan penghasilan nasional bruto yang rendah, setiap tahunnya harus membayar hutang sebesar 26 juta dollar per tahunnya disaat peekonomian negaranya masih sangat rentan.
Ulrich Duchrow dalam bukunya tentang globalisasi yang fenomenal “Alternatives to global capitalism :Drawn for biblical history.Design for Political action, mengatakan bahwa :”Secara global “pembangunan” pada abad ke 20 telah membawa ketidakimbangan/ketidakadilan distribusi pendapatan...ini berarti secara global kita mengalami situasi apharteid dimana perbandingan yang kaya dan yang miskin kira-kira 1:4 .[6]

UNDP pada tahun 1992-2002[7] menggambarkan rasio perbandingan itu demikian :
Distribusi Pendapatan
Terkaya







Termiskin

Seperlima populasi dunia yang terkaya menerima 82,7%
dari total pendapatan dunia.







Seperlima populasi dunia yang termiskin menerima 1,4 %
dari total pendapatan dunia.



Keterangan :
Gambar ini menunjukkan trend distribusi pendapatan global sampai tahun 2002. dengan penjelasan sebagai berikut:
Penduduk Dunia Pendapatan Dunia
Terkaya 20 % 82,7 %
Kedua 20 % 11,7 %
Ketiga 20 % 2,3 %
Keempat 20 % 1,9 %
Termiskin 20 % 1,4 %


Keadaan ini tentu bukanlah sebuah kondisi yang secara tiba-tiba terjadi dan tanpa sebab terjadi begitu saja. Atau menggunakkan istilah Adam Smith karena peran invisible hands. Para ekonom seperti Karl Polanyi,Binswanger,Alvter dan Daly [8]mengatakan bahwa penyebab ketidak adilan sosial global dan pemiskinan global dimungkinkan karena sistem ekonomi global liberal yang tidak berpihak pada kesejahteran anggota masyarakat ,melainkan berorientasi pada penimbunan kekayaan ,yang meminam istilah Marx disebabkan karena adanya pemujuaan komoditas (Fetishisme of Commodity) ,dimana semua faktor :
Kehidupan seseorang ,kebebasannya,kemanusiaannya,kemampuan orang untuk bekerja
Barang-barang,tanah
Kebebasan-kebebasan tertentu.
Semua hal-hal tersebut dikomoditaskan menjadi suatu nilai moneter tertentu,yang dalam beberapa segi karena ketamakan manusia menjadi hal yang mendehumanisasikan harkat dan martabat manusia (dari kelas pekerja) . Karena nilai –nilai hakiki yang menjadi bagian dari diri manusia diukur berdasarkan nilai moneter,maka dapat dikataan bahwa uang adalah dasar yang menjadi tolak ukur kemanusiaan. Sehingga posisi tawar-menawar antara dua kelas (pemilik modal dan pekerja) secara tidak langsung sudah dimenangkan oleh posisi pemilik modal(karena perspektif fethisisme of commodity) yang menjadi pola berpikir dari kedua belah pihak. Penulis tidak dapat menjelaskan secara mendalam tentang konsep ini dalam artikel ini. Untuk studi lebih lanjut pembaca dapat mempelajari buku alternatives to global capitalism oleh Ulrich Duchrow.
Tantangan ini didefinisikan oleh dewan Gereja dunia dengan istilah “global empire” atau kekaisaran global. World Alliance Of Reformed Church (WARC) pada tahun 2004 lewat konferensi di Acra memberikan sebuah pernyataan bersama dan definisi mengenai apa yang disebut dengan “kekaisaran global” yaitu :
“An ideology that claims to be without alternative, demanding an endless flow of sacrifices from the poor and creation.It makes the false promise that it can save the world through the creation of wealth and prosperity, claiming sovereignty over life and demanding total allegiance, which amounts to idolatry.[9]

Adapun ideologi kekaisaran global ini dianut oleh negara-negara maju dan negara-negara
industri sebagai kreditor dan investor. (Amerika serikat ,uni Eropa,dll)

Para penganut ideologi kekaisaran global ini menyebabkan krisis ekonomi diberbagai belahan penjuru dunia karena pendekatan mereka sebagai berikut :

· Kompetisi yang tidak mengenal ampun,budaya konsumerisme , sistem ekonomi penimbunan kekayaan[10]
· Privatisasi aset-aset yang menguasai hajat hidup orang banyak oleh pemilik modal yang tidak memahami obligasi sosial,tatapi hanya mengejar keuntungan semata-mata.
· Spekulasi di pasar modal tanpa memperhitungan dampak sosial,politik,budaya.
· Pajak yang sangat rendah bagi penanaman modal asing ,aliran modal asing ke industri dalam negeri yang tidak dibatasi dengan janji-janji untuk kesejahtraan rakyat . Pebisnis dalam level ekonomi mikro dipaksa bersaing raksasa ekonomi internasional tanpa proteksi.
· Perlindungan hak yang minim terhadap kaum buruh,serikat pekerja dan buruh,hubungan antar manusia yang disubordinakan dibawah kepentingan “pertumbuhan ekonomi” dan akumulasi kapital.


Bagaimana kaum injili seharusnya meresponi hal ini dalam konteks Indonesia?

Kaum injili meyakini bahwa Alkitab sebgi firman Allah adalah dasar dari segala petimbangannya dalam meresponi tantangan aktual pergumulan hidup dan panggilan pelayanan. Alkitab ,sebagaimana sudah diulas diawal artkel ini sudah memberikan berbagai seruan bagi pengikut Kristus untuk menjadi pelaku yang pro aktif didalam penegakan keadilan sosial.
Kitab Mikha pasal 6 menyampaikan panggilan Allah terhadap umat Israel. Salah satu panggilan di ayat 8 adalah bahwa Allah yang memiliki atribut adil dan benar ,juga memanggil umatnya demikian :
“ Hai manusia telah diperintahkan kepadamu apa yang baik .Dan apa yang dituntut TUHAN dari padamu selain berlaku adil ,mencintai kesetiaan, dan hidup dengan rendah hati dihadapan Allahmu?[11]
Tanpa berusaha menyederhanakan masalah besar ini, orang percaya , dipanggil oleh Kristus untuk menjadi garam dan terang dunia dengan mengambil bagian dalam menegakan keadilan sosial dan mengambil menjadi bagian dari solusi. Tidak dipungkiri juga bagi kita yang hidup di Indonesia,dan dalam konteks Indonesia aktual saat ini menjelang pemilu 2009 ,dimana 30 % angkatan kerja masih menganggur,40 juta orang dalam status pra sejahtera,angka kematian bayi dan gizi buruk yang cukup tinggi.Maka penegakkan keadilan sosial adalah tugas aktual yang seharusnya dilakukan dalam misi integral kaum injili selain misi penginjilan.
Hal pertama yang dapat dilakukan untuk terlibat dalam penegakan keadilan sosial dapat diawali dengan mengadopsi pemikiran teologi misi integral.Kaum Injili harus memahami dan memasukannya kedalam agenda teologisnya tentang pemahaman bahwa Allah yang maha adil dan benar itu juga menghendaki umat tebusannya sebgai warga kerajaan Allah untuk mencintai keadilan dan membawa keadilan sosial bagi umat mausia didalam dunia yang berdosa ini . Misi ini adalah mandat budaya yang seharusnya berjalan seiring dengan mandat injil.Seluruh lapisan warga jemaat perlu diberikan pemahaman ini agar memiliki perspektif sebagai subjek yang bertanggung jawab juga karena statusnya yang baru sebagai warga kerajaan Allah.
Hal yang kedua yang dapat dilakukan oleh umat percaya adalah dengan mengambil bagian didalam penderitaan korban ketidakadilan sosial. Gereja Indonesia perlu dibangunkan dari “eskapisme” terhadap issue kemisikinan. Kita melihat bahwa dalam 5 tahun terakhir ini gereja-gereja di Indonesia dengan begitu arogannya dan tanpa merasa bertanggung jawab telah melakukan hal ,yang menurut penulis ,merupakan pengabaian dan penyangkalan realitas. Dimana ditengah masa krisis berkepanjangan para pejabat gerejawi dari denominasi –denominasi besar justru membangun rumah ibadah dan ruang pertemuan yang sangat mewah. Yang secara ironisnya dananya juga dikumpulkan dari persembahan jemaat. Bahkan penulis menjumpai didenominasi tertentu dimana para jemaat (termasuk yang berkekurangan) dihimbau oleh para pendeta gereja bersangkutan untuk menjual hartanya ,menyumbangkan uangnya, dan terlibat dalam usaha-usaha pengumpulan dana untuk pembangunan “mega proyek” ambisius tersebut dengan mengatasnamakan “suara Tuhan” atau Perintah Tuhan”. Para jemaat yang lugu dan polos diberi pemahamaan yang sangat sempit tentang pekerjaan misi oleh para pejabat gereja yang ambisius . Gereja injili khususnya perlu bertobat dari hal ini . Gereja perlu merangkul korban kekerasan sosial,ketidakadilan sosial dengan cara membuka pintu seluas-luasnya untuk menjadi saluran berkat bagi mereka yang menjadi korban. Allah didalam alkitab adalah Allah yang berpihak kepada korban dan yang lemah. Gereja juga harus mengambil peran demikian didalam pendampingan dan rehabilitasi golongan yang lemah .
Langkah yang ketiga yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan cara melakukan aksi proaktif secara politis bagi terwujudnya keadilan sosial regional. Langkah ini telah menjadi wacana ini telah diadopsi menjadi gerakan moral oleh World Evangelical Alliance pada tahun 2005 ,yaitu dengan memberikan dorongan bagi gereja-gereja injili untuk melakukan “upaya-upaya “ yang perlu untuk penegakkan keadilan sosial lingkungannya. Mulai dari penyelengaraan diskusi tentang issue keadilan sosial regional dalam kelompok sel ,keterlibatan gereja lokal dalam penciptaan lapangan pekerjaan bagi anggota jemaat dan masyarakat sekitar gereja, melakukan aksi politis damai mulai dari surat kepada wakil rakyat sampai demonstrasi damai. Mulai dari penolakan untuk bekerjasama dengan lembaga donor gereja yang korup sampai kepada pemboikotan produk-produk yang mengabaikan kesejahteraan sosial dalam proses produksinya.
Langkah keempat yang dapat dilakukan oleh orang percaya adalah tentunya membawa segala aksi dan tindakan penegakan keadilan sosial kedalam doa. Doa oarng percaya yang lahir dari kesadaran dan iman akan kedaulatan mutlak Allah tritunggal atas sejarah manusia. Doa yang lahir dari penghayatan akan beban sakit besalin yang ditanggung segala mahluk karena dosa (band. Roma 8:22) yang ditanggung oleh segala mahluk. Semakin spesifik pengenalan kita akan pegumulan di zaman ini ,maka beban doa yang dibawakan akan semakn jelas dan tulus.
Orang percaya sebagai bagian anggota keraajaan Allah yang sudah datang dan akan datang “dipanggil” sebagai orang yang telah diselamatkan untuk mewujudkan suatu refleksi kehendak Allah untuk keadilan dan kebenaran. Allah yang adil dan benar menghendaki dunia mengenal keadil benaran melalui cara hidup alternatif yang diwujudnyatakan dari anggota kerajaannya ditengah “rasa sakit bersalin” yang dialami segala mahluk karena dosa.
[1] Literatur pemuridan Kristen injili pada umumnya hanya menekankan pada jaminan keselamatan,saat teduh,integritas pribadi dan keuangan. Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan tanggung jawab sosial dan keadialn sosial sangat jarang dibahas didalam literatur pemuridan kristen injili. Apakah karena banyak buku-buku pemuridan kristen injili diterbitan oleh penerbit-penebit dari negara maju yang relatif tidak merasakan dampak ketidak adilan sosial global?
[2] Untuk studi lebih lanjut bandingkan dengan artikel Ortega,Ofelia ;The Mission of The Church in The Context of Crisis.Reformed World Journal .pp 133-135,Vol .54, 2004.
[3] Matius 22:34-40 ini menjadi dasar bagi banyak organisasi bernafaskan Kristen menjadi lembaga yang sangat menghargai kemanusiaan.Sebab penghargaan kepada kemanusiaan adalah bagian dari ibadah yang tidak terpisahkan dengan penghargaan dan kasih kepada Allah.
[4] Dalam parabel ini digambarkan oleh Yesus kesempitan berpikir orang Yahudi yang munafik yang memisahkan kasih kepada Allah dengan keadilan dan kasih kepada sesama dalam adegan dimana ada orang Lewi dan Imama yang adalah icon atau simbol kesalehan ,justru tidak menolong sesamanya yang menderita karena ketidakpedulianya atau mungkin karena beresiko akan merepotkan dirinya apabila ternyata korban perampokan itu meninggal dunia sehingga akan menajiskan dirinya (karena berkontak fisik dengan mayat) yang menurutnya akan menghambat hubungan mereka dengan Allah.
[5] www.Micahchallenge.org/overview
[6] Duchrow,Ulrich;Altenatives to global capitlism:Drawn for biblical History.Design for Political Action.pp.5.International Books.A Numakande 17,Utrecht 1994.
[7] Lihat jurnal Reformed World ,Empire.Vol 56 (4) December 2006 hal. 342
[8] Op.Cit. pp.63
[9] WARC;Covenanting of Justice :Accra Confession .Reformed World Vol.54.pp.170
[10] Aristoteles menyampaikan gagasan klasik tentang dua sistem ekonomi kapitalis. Sisitem ekonomi kapitalis yang baik digambarkan Aristoteles dengan sebutan oikonomia” ,yaitu sistem ekonomi yang dirancang untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pokok angota rumah tangga dan masyarakat secara keseluruhan (koinonia,polis).Hal ini berarti bahwa tujuan utama ekonomi yang wajar adalah pemenuhan kebutuhan manusia. Sedangkan sistem ekonoi yang kuran baik menurt Aristoteles adalah “Cherematistike” atau pengumpulan uang demi uang itu sendiri. Tujuan akhir ekonomi bukanlah social welfare lagi ,melainkan monopoli,spekulasi harga dan menjalankan Riba. Untuk penjelasan yang lebih lengkap pembaca dapat membaca buku karngan Aristoteles Politics ,buku 1 bab 8 -13
[11] Mikha 6 :8 LAI-TB

Selasa, 27 Januari 2009

Earth democracy, living democracy



by: Vandana Shiva
The economic, ecological and social crises resulting from corporate
globalization are inviting us to a new way of thinking and being on this planet. A
new worldview in which it is not greed but compassion that is globalized; a new
consciousness in which we are not reduced to consumers of globally traded
commodities, but see ourselves as planetary beings with a planetary consciousness,
mindful of what our actions and our consumption cost to other humans, other
species and future generations. A physicist and social activist from India, Vandana
Shiva presented this paper at the keynote event of the 2004 WARC general council.
Humanity seems to be in free fall towards disaster. The unfolding destruction is
militaristic, political, cultural, ecological and economic. We witness violence and war on
a global scale, justified sometimes as a clash of civilizations, sometimes as a war against
terror or an “axis of evil”. Terrorism, fundamentalism, violence and war spread
like a planetary contagion.
Democracy is being eroded and undermined in every society. Biodiversity,
water resources and ecosystems are under assault by a predatory global economy, with
no limits to its reach, its exploitation of nature’s wealth, or its use of violence and
coercion to appropriate resources from communities. The rise of terrorism,
fundamentalism and police states A new politics of hatred and intolerance
is arising from growing economic insecurity and a sense of shrinking space for survival.
Representative democracy loses its base in economic democracy as decisions move out
of countries into the boardrooms of global corporations and into global institutions like
the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Trade Organization
(WTO). Politicians, robbed of the power to ensure that people’s basic needs are
provided for, move to political agendas of exclusion to garner votes and stay in office. The forces unleashed by globalization are killing democracy along with people’s economic security.
Democracy emptied of economic freedom and ecological freedom Over the past two decades, I have witnessed conflicts over development and conflicts over natural resources mutate into
communal conflicts, culminating in extremism and terrorism. My book Violence
of the Green Revolution was an attempt to
understand the ecology of terrorism. The lessons I have drawn from the growing but
diverse expressions of fundamentalism and terrorism are the following: Undemocratic economic systems that centralize control over decision-making and resources and displace people from
productive employment and livelihoods create a culture of insecurity. Every policy
decision is translated into the politics of “we” and “they”. “We” have been unjustly
treated; “they” have gained privileges. Globalization is creating a global culture of
insecurity. The destruction of resource rights and the erosion of democratic control of natural
resources, the economy, and means of production undermine cultural identity. With
identity no longer coming from the positive experience of being a farmer, a craftsperson,
a teacher or a nurse, culture is reduced to a negative shell where one identity is in
competition with the “other” over scarce resources that define economic and political
power. Positive identities mutate into negative identities – “I” am not the “other”,
and annihilation and extinction of the other
is necessary for my security and survval. Centralized economic systems also erode
the democratic base of politics. In a
democracy, the economic agenda is the political agenda. When the economic agenda is hijacked by the World Bank, the IMF or the WTO, democracy is undermined. The only cards left in the hands of politicians eager to garner votes are those of race, religion and ethnicity. The result is
fundamentalism, which fills the vacuum left by a decaying democracy. Economic
globalization fuels economic insecurity, eroding cultural diversity and identity, and assaulting the political freedoms of citizens. It provides fertile ground for the cultivation
of fundamentalism and terrorism. Instead of integrating people, it tears communities
apart.


Rejuvenating, deepening and widening democracy has become a survival imperative
for the human species. Reinventing freedom in our time requires freedom from fear,
freedom from violence, freedom from denial of basic needs, and freedom from nonsustainable
and unethical patterns of production, trade and consumption. Instead of addressing the root causes of terrorism and fundamentalism in the growth of economic insecurity and the
collapse of economic democracy by ensuring that people’s needs are met and their
livelihoods protected, states across the world are making laws to shut down
democracy and freedom in the name of fighting terror.

The Patriot Act in the US, the Prevention
of Terrorism Act in India, or the Anti-
Terrorism, Crime and Security Act in the
UK – these new laws created after Sept 11
2001 are not just laws against terrorists. They
are laws against citizens’ democratic
defence of their fundamental freedoms,
which are being trampled upon by the forces
of globalization.
Fear and violence have come to dominate
our lives. Rule through fear and violence is
becoming the dominant mechanism for
117
governance. In another period, it would have
been described as the rise of fascism, with
the totalitarianism of corporate control over
markets combining with the totalitarianism
of militarized states, taking away from
people their fundamental rights and
freedoms.
A great leap backwards? Globalization
was projected as the next great leap of
human evolution in a linear forward march
from tribes to nations to global markets.
Our identities and context were to move
from the national to the global, just as in
the earlier phase of state-driven
development they were supposed to have
moved from the local to the national.
Deregulated commerce and corporate
rule were offered as the alternative to
centralized bureaucratic control under
communist regimes and state-dominated
economies. Markets were offered as an
alternative to states for regulating our lives,
not just our economies.
As the globalization project has unfolded,
it has exposed its bankruptcy at the
philosophical, political, ecological and
economic levels. The bankruptcy of the
dominant world order is leading to social,
political, economic and ecological nonsustainability,
with economies, societies and
ecosystems disintegrating and breaking
down.
The privatization of resources
The philosophical and ethical
bankruptcy of globalization stems from
reducing all aspects of our lives to
commodities and shrinking our identities
to that of consumers in a global marketplace.
Our capacities as producers, our identity as
members of communities, our role as
custodians of our natural and cultural
heritage are all to disappear or be destroyed.
Two-thirds of humanity depend on
natural resources for their livelihoods and
meeting basic needs. They live in an
economy with land, water and biodiversity
as their primary capital, their means of
production, their economic security.
Ecological destruction, erosion, pollution, or
privatization of these vital resources
translates into poverty and underdevelopment.
Globalization is deepening
poverty and underdevelopment by robbing
the poor of their sources of livelihood in
land, water and living resources.
Corporate globalization is enabling
corporations to steal from the poor their
last resources, their seeds and biodiversity,
their food and water, their land and forests.
And as predatory and non-sustainable
models of economic development spread
worldwide, species are pushed to extinction,
rivers and glaciers are disappearing, and
millions are uprooted from their homes and
displaced.
Water is privatized, biodiversity and
genetic resources are patented and land is
taken over by force for industry, mines,
highways and ports.
The case of India Gandhi rejuvenated
the concept of swaraj (self-rule) as a core
118
element of freedom. Movements in postindependent
India struggled to enshrine
deep democracy in the constitution.
For instance, India passed the Provisions
of Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled
Areas) Act, 1996,2 recognizing the local
community in tribal areas as the highest
authority in matters of culture, resources,
and conflict resolution. For the first time
since India’s independence, village
communities (gram sabhas) were granted
legal acknowledgment as community
entities. Village communities retained a
number of powers, including the power to
approve or reject development plans and
programmes. Gram sabhas were also given
the authority to grant land.
The Extension Act accepted the
traditions of the people and their cultural
identity by honouring their traditional
relationship with the natural resources in
their homeland. As the law stated, “all state
legislation on the panchayats that may be
made shall be in consonance with the
customary law, social and religious practices
and traditional management practices of
community resources.”
Control over community resources was
recognized as not only an economic
necessity but a touchstone of cultural
identity: “Every gram sabha shall be
competent to safeguard and preserve the
traditions and customs of the people, their
cultural identity, community resources and
the customary mode of dispute resolution.”
After the natural rights of the community
to self-governance, including command over
resources, were enshrined in the
constitution through the Extension Act, it
was expected that the unfortunate
confrontation between the tribal people and
the state, which ironically took a new turn
after independence, would cease.
The Land Acquisition Act (1894) is the
most dreaded and draconian relic of British
rule and has been responsible for uprooting
not less than 30 million people after
independence, more than half of them
being tribals. As a result of the Extension
Act, however, consultation with the gram
sabha, the assembly of the people, is now a
constitutionally mandated precondition
before starting land acquisition.
With honourable exceptions, the rulers
in India – both civil servants and political
executives – have not taken kindly to these
provisions that make the gram sabha
fundamental in governance at the village
level. Most of the central and state laws
remain to be suitably adapted. In the case
of land acquisition, since the mandate is
specific, guidelines for consultation have
been issued by the union government and
also framed by some state governments.
This democratic process was
scandalously subverted in Nagarnar, Bastar
District, Chhattisgarh, where the state
government proposed to allow the National
Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC)
to acquire land to build a steel plant.3 The
four gram sabhas concerned rejected the
proposal, but their dissent was converted
into assent by destroying the accounts of
their proceedings and preparing false records.
119
The National Commission for Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes, on the basis
of an enquiry under Article 338 of the
constitution, came to the conclusion that
senior officers, including the District
Collector and the Chief Executive of the
NMDC, had conspired to commit criminal
offences. The National Commission found
that in the absence of mandatory
consultation, the land acquisition was ab
initio null and void, but its recommendations
were not even acknowledged.
Other guidelines also have not been
followed. No application for environmental
clearance was made before the land was
acquired. An untried technology that
involves the manufacture, storage and use
of carbon monoxide is being used. This raises
several questions about the proposed plant.
The four gram sabhas scheduled a joint
assembly in March 2002 to discuss the plant
and invited the state and NMDC officials to
dialogue with them. The officials did not
respond. On the contrary, hooligans blocked
all the routes to Nagarnar and hundreds of
those invited, mostly women, were beaten
up. National figures, like Sarvoday leader
Siddraj Dhaddha, Dada Tukaram
Geetacharya (a great saint), the senior
journalist Manimala and I were also invited
but were refused permission to attend and
forced to go back.
Breaking all the conventions of civil
dialogue, terror was let loose on the people,
forcing them to accept cheques in
compensation for the land or face brutal
beatings and jail. The NMDC forcibly took
possession of land on the strength of an
award that was manipulated through
criminal deeds. A reign of terror prevails ever
since.
This is just one of many examples.
In Orissa, one of the poorest Indian
states, the World Bank and the UK
Department for International Development
(DFID) are using northern taxpayers’ money
to privatize irrigation water, which now costs
10 times more than before and is destroying
agriculture, the only livelihood of the poor.4
In Delhi, a $2.5 million World Bank loan
for water privatization has largely financed
the consultancy fees of an international
accounting firm, Price Waterhouse.
The Trade-Related Intellectual Property
Rights Agreement (TRIPS) is privatizing the
biological and genetic commons through
patents.5 We have had to struggle over years
in the courts, in society, and in the corridors
of power to have the patents on Neem and
Basmati revoked.6
“Lives” and “live nots”
Globalization is rewriting our
relationship with the earth and her species,
alienating land, water and biodiversity from
local communities, transforming commons
into commodities to be traded freely for
profit – with total indifference to the ethical,
ecological and economic impacts of this
commodification of life.
Globalization is a break from all earlier
stages of human relationship with the earth
and her resources. It is based on enclosure
of the remaining ecological commons –
120
biodiversity, water and air – and the
destruction of local economies on which
people’s livelihoods and economic security
depend. The transformation of commons
to commodities is ensured through shifts in
governance and through new property rights
built into WTO trade agreements that
transform people’s resources into corporate
monopolies. Decision-making is taken away
from communities and countries and given
to global institutions. Rights move from
people to corporations through increasingly
centralized and unaccountable states acting
on the principle of eminent domain – the
absolute sovereignty of the ruler. Instead of
acting on the doctrine of public trust and
principles of democratic accountability and
subsidiarity, governments usurp power from
parliaments, regional and local
governments, and local communities.
• The TRIPs agreement was based on
central governments hijacking the rights to
biodiversity and knowledge from
communities and assigning them as
monopoly rights to corporations.
• The Agreement on Agriculture was
based on taking decisions away from farming
communities and regional governments.
• The General Agreement on Trade in
Services (GATS) takes decisions and
ownership over water from the local and
public domain to the privatized, global
domain.
This undemocratic process of
privatization and deregulation has
concentrated power and ownership, has
fuelled corruption, and has led to economic
and political bankruptcy. The old
polarization of “haves and have nots” is
mutating into a new polarization of “lives
and live nots” as the very basis and fabric of
life is commodified and privatized.
State sovereignty by itself is not a
sufficient counterweight to corporate
globalization. The reinvention of sovereignty
has to be based on the reinvention of the
state so that the state is made accountable
to the people. Sovereignty cannot reside only
in centralized state structures, nor does it
disappear when the protective functions of
the state with respect to its people start to
wither away. The new partnership of
national sovereignty needs empowered
communities that assign functions to the
state for their protection.
Communities defending themselves
always demand such duties and obligations
from state structures. On the other hand,
transnational corporations and
international agencies promote the
separation of community interests from
state interests and the fragmentation and
division of communities.
Earth democracy: beyond the rule
of terror and greed
We need once more to feel at home on
the earth and with each other. We need a
new paradigm to respond to the
fragmentation caused by various forms of
fundamentalism. We need a new
movement that allows us to move from the
dominant and pervasive culture of violence,
destruction and death to a culture of non121
violence, creative peace and life. That is why
in India we started the Earth Democracy
movement.
Earth democracy embodies principles
that enable us to transcend the polarization,
divisions and exclusions that pit the
economy against ecology, development
against the environment, people against the
planet, and people against one another in a
new culture of hate.
Earth democracy recontextualizes
humans as members of the Earth family
(Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam), and as members
of diverse cultures in the mosaic of cultural
diversity that enriches our lives.
Re-embedding humans in the ecological
matrix of biological and cultural diversity
reopens spaces for sustainability, justice and
peace by reorganizing relationships,
restructuring constellations of power and
revitalizing freedom and democracy.
We are being ruled by terror and greed,
fear and insecurity. As we face the double
closure of corporate globalization and
militarized police states, our challenge is to
reclaim our freedoms and the freedoms of
our fellow beings. The Earth Democracy
movement embodies two indivisibilities and
continuums. The first is the continuum of
freedom for all life on earth, and for all
humans, without discrimination on the basis
of gender, race, religion, class and species.
The second is the indivisibility of justice,
peace and sustainability – without
sustainability and just sharing of the earth’s
bounties there is no justice, and without
justice there can be no peace.
Corporate globalization ruptures these
continuities. It establishes corporate rule
through a policy of divide and rule, and
creates competition and conflict between
different species and peoples and between
different aims. It transforms diversity and
multiplicity into oppositional differences, by
breeding fundamentalisms through
spreading insecurity and then using these
fundamentalisms to shift people’s focus from
sustainability and justice and peace to
ethnic and religious conflict and violence.
Earth democracy is democracy for all life,
not just humans – and definitely not just
humans privileged through class, race,
gender and religion.
Since other species do not vote, cannot
lobby, and have no purchasing power in the
marketplace, earth democracy creates an
obligation on us as humans to take their
wellbeing into account.7 This defines our
human responsibility as trustees and
stewards, instead of the dominant notion
of mastery, control and ownership.
Earth democracy privileges diversity in
nature and society in form and in function.
When the intrinsic worth and value of every
life form and every human is recognized,
biological diversity and cultural diversity
flourish. Monocultures result from exclusion
and dominance of species, one variety, one
race, one religion. Monocultures are an
indication of coercion and loss of freedom.
Freedom implies diversity. Diversity signifies
freedom.
Earth democracy also nourishes diversity
by going beyond the logic of exclusion, of
122
apartheid, of “us” and “them”, of “either/or”,
of the law of the excluded middle. It is in the
included middle that diversity and creativity
flourish in nature and in culture.
The law of the included middle also
implies multifunctionality, the logic of “and”,
instead of “either/or”. It transcends the false
polarization of wild vs cultivated, of nature
vs culture, and even the false clash of
cultures. It allows for the forest farm and
the farmed forest. It recognizes that
biodiversity can be preserved and also
support human needs.
A myth promoted by the onedimensional
monoculture paradigm is that
biodiversity reduces yields and productivity,
and monocultures increase yields and
productivity. However, since yields and
productivity are theoretically constructed
terms, they change according to the context.
Yields usually refer to production per unit
area of a single crop. Planting only one crop
in the entire field as a monoculture will of
course increase its yield. Planting multiple
crops in a mixture will have low yields of
individual crops, but will have high total
output of food.
Earth democracy puts responsibility and
duties at the core of our relationships, with
rights flowing from responsibility instead of
the dominant paradigm of rights without
responsibility and responsibility without
rights. The separation of rights and
responsibility is at the root of ecological
devastation and gender, class inequality.
Corporations that earn profits from the
chemical industry or from genetic pollution
resulting from genetically modified (GM)
crops do not have to bear the burden of
their pollution. The social and ecological
costs are externalized and borne by others
who are excluded from diecisions and from
benefits.
Earth democracy is based on those who
pay the price having a say. This creates the
need for direct or basic democracy. This
implies decisions moving downwards, from
global institutions and centralized
governments to local communities, and
implies a shift in iour interpretation of
sovereignty.
The global, for us, must strengthen the
local andj national, not undermine it. The
two tendencies that we demand of the
economic system – localization and
alternatives – need to be central to people’s
politics. Without them, forces for change
cannot be mobilized.
At the heart of building alternatives and
localizing economic and political systems is
the recovery of the commons and the
reclaiming of community. The Living
Democracy movement is reclaiming people’s
sovereignty and community rights to natural
resources.
Rights to natural resources are natural
rights. They are not given by states, nor can
they be extinguished by states, the WTO, or
by corporations, even though under
globalization, attempts are being made to
alienate people’s rights to vital resources of
land water and biodiversity.
This shift is also an ecological imperative.
As members of the earth family – Vasudhaiva
123
Kutumbhakam8 – we have a share in the
earth’s resources. Rights to natural resources
for needs of sustenance are natural rights.
They are not given or assigned. They are
recognized or they are ignored. The eminent
domain principle inevitably leads to “all for
some” – corporate monopolies over
biodiversity through patents, corporate
monopolies on water through privatization
and corporate monopolies over food through
free trade.
The most basic right we have as a
species is survival, the right to life. Survival
requires guaranteed access to resources.
Commons provide that guarantee.
Privatization and enclosures destroy it.
Localization is necessary for recovery of the
commons. And earth democracy is the
movement to relocate our minds, our
production systems and consumption
patterns from the poverty-creating global
markets to the sustainability and sharing of
the earth community. This shift from global
markets to earth citizenship is a shift of
focus from globalization to localization of
power from corporations to citizens.
Earth democracy is about life, and
natural rights to the conditions of staying
alive. It is everyday life and decisions and
freedoms related to everyday living – the
food we eat, the clothes we wear, the water
we drink. It is not just about elections and
casting votes once in three or four or five
years. It is a permanently vibrant
democracy. It combines economic
democracy with political democracy and
ecological democracy. It creates positive
economies, positive politics, positive
identities. It creates security.
Earth democracy is not dead, it is alive.
Under globalization, democracy even of the
shallow representative kind is dying.
Governments everywhere are betraying the
mandates that brought them to power. They
are centralizing authority and power, both
by subverting democratic structures of
constitutions and by promulgating
ordinances that stifle civil liberties. The Sept
11 tragedy has become a convenient excuse
for anti-people legislation worldwide.
Politicians everywhere are turning to
xenophobic and fundamentalist agendas to
get votes in a period when economic
agendas have been taken away from
national levels and are being set by the
World Bank, the IMF, the WTO and global
corporations.
The earth democracy movement is about
living rather than dead democracy.
Democracy is dead when governments no
longer reflect the will of the people but are
reduced to unaccountable instruments of
corporate rule under the constellation of
corporate globalization as the Enron and
Chiquita cases make so evident.
Corporate globalization is centred on
corporate profits. Earth democracy is based
on maintaining life on earth and freedom
for all species and people.
Corporate globalization operates to
create rules for the global, national and local
markets that privilege global corporations
and threaten diverse species, the livelihoods
of the poor and small, local producers and
124
businesses. Earth democracy operates
according to the ecological laws of nature,
and limits commercial activity to prevent
harm to other species and to people.
Corporate globalization is exercised
through centralizing, destructive power.
Earth democracy is exercised through
decentralized power and peaceful
coexistence.
Corporate globalization globalizes greed
and consumerism. Living democracy
globalizes compassion, caring and sharing.
The economic, ecological and social
crises resulting from corporate globalization
are inviting us to a new way of thinking and
being on this planet. A new worldview in
which it is not greed but compassion that is
globalized; a new consciousness in which
we are not reduced to consumers of globally
traded commodities, but see ourselves as
planetary beings with a planetary
consciousness, mindful of what our actions
and our consumption cost other humans,
other species and future generations.
Earth democracy offers a new way of
seeing and being earth citizens, through
which we can create peace, sustainability
and justice in our volatile and violent
times.
Earth democracy: principles
1. Ecological democracy – We are all
members of the earth community. We all
have the duty to protect the rights and
welfare of all species and all people. No
humans have the right to encroach on
the ecological space of other species and
other people, or treat them with cruelty
and violence.
2. Intrinsic worth of all species and
peoples – All species, humans and cultures
have intrinsic worth. They are subjects, not
objects of manipulation or ownership. No
humans have the right to own other species,
other people or the knowledge of other
cultures through patents and other
intellectual property rights.
3. Diversity in nature and culture –
Defending biological and cultural diversity
is a duty of all people. Diversity is an end in
itself, a value, a source of richness both
material and cultural.
4. Natural rights to sustenance – All
members of the earth community, including
all humans, have the right to sustenance –
to food and water, to safe and clean habitat,
to security of ecological space. These rights
are natural rights, they are birthrights given
by the fact of existence on earth and are
best protected through community rights
and commons. They are not given by states
or corporations, nor can they be
extinguished by state or corporate action.
No state or corporation has the right to erode
or undermine these natural rights or enclose
the commons that sustain all through
privatization or monopoly control.
5. Earth democracy and living
economy – Economic systems in earth
democracy protect ecosystems and their
integrity, they protect people’s livelihoods
and provide basic needs to all. In the earth
economy there are no disposable or
dispensable species or people. The earth
125
economy is a living economy. It is based on
sustainable, diverse, pluralistic systems that
protect nature and people, are chosen by
people, for the benefit of the common good.
6. Living economies are built on local
economies – Conservation of the earth’s
resources and creation of sustainable and
satisfying livelihoods are most caringly,
creatively, efficiently and equitably achieved
at the local level. Localization of economies
is a social and ecological imperative. Only
goods and services that cannot be produced
locally, using local resources and local
knowledge, should be produced non-locally
and traded long distances. Earth democracy
is based on vibrant, resilient local economies
that support national and global economies.
The global economy does not crush and
destroy local economies.
7. Living democracy – Earth democracy
is based on local living democracy with local
communities, organized on principles of
inclusion and diversity and ecological and
social responsibility, having the highest
authority on decisions related to the
environment and natural resources and to
the sustenance and livelihoods of people.
Authority is delegated to more distant levels
of governance on the principle of subsidiarity.
Earth democracy is living democracy.
8. Living knowledge – Earth democracy
is based on earth-centred and communitycentred
knowledge systems. Living
knowledge is knowledge that maintains and
renews living processes and contributes to
the health of the planet and people. It is
also living knowledge in that it is embedded
in nature and society. It is not abstract,
reductionist and anti-life. Living knowledge
is a commons: it belongs collectively to
communities that create it and keep it alive.
All humans have a duty to share knowledge.
No person or corporation has a right to
enclose, monopolize, patent, or exclusively
own as intellectual property, living
knowledge.
9. Balancing rights with responsibility
–In earth democracy, rights are derived from
and balanced with responsibility. Those who
bear the consequences of decisions and
actions are the decision-makers.
10. Globalizing peace, care and
compassion – Earth democracy connects
people in circles of care, cooperation and
compassion instead of dividing them through
competition and conflict. Earth democracy
globalizes compassion, not greed, and peace,
not war.
126
1 Vandana Shiva, Violence of the Green
Revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology
and politics (London/New York/Penang:
Zed Books/Third World Network, 1991).
2 Henceforth, the Extension Act. A
panchayat is an elected body representing
one or several villages. A gram sabha is the
general assembly of the village, composed
of all the adult residents. The Constitution
(Seventy-third Amend- ment) Act, 1992, set
up a three-tier structure of panchayats at
village, intermediate and district levels, with
gram sabhas at the village level; the 1996
act extended these provisions to the tribal
areas of states such as Chhattisgarh and
Madhya Pradesh (Schedule V areas). [Ed]
3 Formerly part of Madhya Pradesh state,
Chhattisgarh became a separate state on
November 1 2000.
4 See further on this subject, Vandana
Shiva,
Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution and
Profit (London: Pluto Press, 2002).
5 The WTO’s Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights,
negotiated in the 1986-94 Uruguay Round,
introduced intellectual property rules into
the multilateral trading system for the first
time. See Vandana Shiva, Patents: Myths
and reality (New Delhi: Penguin Books India,
2001), republished as Protect or Plunder?
Understanding intellectual property rights
(London: Zed Books, 2001).
6 See further, Vandana Shiva, Stolen Harvest:
The hijacking of the global food supply
(Cambridge MA: South End Press, 1999;
London: Zed Books, 2000).
7 As His Holiness the Dalai Lama said on
his 60th birthday, “All beings have a right to
wellbeing and happiness. We have a duty to
ensure their wellbeing.”
8 “The whole world is one family.”
Notes

Jumat, 23 Januari 2009